quinta-feira, 26 de novembro de 2015

25 October 2015 - Victory Day

Due to the intensivety of the last few weeks, it was not possible to post celebrating the victory in the elections and the large protests

It's the Demography, Stupid

It's the Demography, Stupid. The real reason the West is in danger of extinction. If we are demographically sound, then there is no amount of terrorism, no amount of barbarism, no amount of stupid decisions by politicians, that can destroy the Western Civilization. The romans were defeated by the germanic invasors, but eventually their larger numbers meant that the germans were absorved into the Portuguese, Spanish, French & Italian population and latin-speaking countries were reborn. Similarly China was conquered by the Manchus, but eventually the chinese were so many, that they completely absorved the Manchus leading to the next extinction of the Manchus themselves and their language solely by intermariage, while China was reborn. On the opposite side, Amerindians reproduced slowly due to their high death rate and were largely wiped out of most of the americas (excluding Bolivia and Peru). So if you are numerous, even a catastrophic military defeat can become a rebirth. If you are not, then... well, if you are not, then people in 100 years from now will write books trying to explain why you disappeared.

So let's apply this to Poland, and the proposed government plan of giving money so that people have more children. The current & future demographic pyramid of Poland, as well as amount of children in families, is:

The chart for 2050 shows that Poland will face severe loss of population during 2070-2080, tens of millions, and it will be extremely hard to replace them due to the low amount of woman in birth bearing age:
Compare with Afganistan which generates a huge number of refugees going to Europe:

How many children people currently have:

Worker to Pensionist ratio for the USA, note that the USA receives tons of young migrants. For countries such as Poland and Japan the ration will be much worse, more like 1.5 to 1 by 2050. Pensions will be insanely low.
Compare this with Nigeria:

And here is proof that the African population explosion has nothing to do with they all being farmers. The Africans explosion lives in slums, they are not rural!

And a real life demonstration of how a fertility of 2,07 takes no immediate effect, but instead due to the large inertia in demographics, it takes a lot of time to stabilize and fertility changes cannot change short term trends in population loss or gain:

Not to mention the islamic problem:

Back to Poland

The original proposal was 500zl for each child, except the first which would get 0zl. The program is insanely expensive, however, costing around 22 billion zlotes per year. So many proposals are circulating as to how to make it affordable, some going as far as cutting most people out and giving only to the very poor, which in my oppinion would make the program nearly useless in solving our demographical death.

I propose that we should make a huge effort to convince people to have 3 children, not merely 2:

1> 1000zl be given for families with 3+ children, regardless of income
2> For very poor families give temporary help, such as during the first 3 years after birth 500zl, and the permanent help only if they achieve our 3 children target. Give more money if they have even more children. Make it a business case for some people to be children factories to compensate the huge amount of childless people.
3> Make a campaign, something like "Save Poland, have 3 chilren, 2 is not enough! We are each time less", show charts, etc, ask Churches to talk about it. It costs almost nothing, and might be even more effective than the money.
4> Offer all kinds of technological solutions for people that cannot have chilren, if necessary go as far as using bangladeshi surrogate mothers to give birth! Pay them properly and it will be no problem to find woman in poor countries willing to help us survive. The government should finance this for free.

I'm afraid of recommending 4 children, although that would be really necessary from my calculations, since 4 might seam to people insanely high and unachievable, while 3 is quite reasonable. So let's stick to a 3 children target.

Calculated necessary effect to stop our demographical death:

Demographers say we need a 5% margin, we need 2.1 children per woman on average to break even. So let's target at least 2.15 to have at least a 2,5% extra safety margin. We need the 5% margin to compensate for deaths by car accidents (around 3 thousand per year), to compensate for deaths due to all kinds of illnesses, airplane accidents, murders, suicides, terrorist attacks, etc, etc.

Actually to compensate for emigration to western countries we would need something like 2,3 or more, to help compensate for the dying west and repopulate it with poles, but from my calculatings even 2,15 is extremely hard, so this is likely not realistic.

Nr of Children Poland 2015
Poland Target

Percent Sum Percent Sum

0 0,3 0 0,3 0
1 0,2 0,2 0,1 0,1
2 0,37 0,74 0 0
3 0,07 0,21 0,47 1,41
4 0 0 0,07 0,28
5 0,06 0,3 0 0

0,06 0,36


So currently our average is 1,45 children per woman. To get to our target 2,15 we need that:

1> I'll assume that the 30% childless cannot in any way be moved out of this state. I suppose that many will have all kinds of good reasons for not having children and will not be possible to move them to have children. I assume the following reasons:
1.1> Severe illness (think down, autism, paraplegy, etc)
1.2> Mental illness
1.3> is a hedonist that doesn't want to bother having children
1.4> is of Radical Environmentalist ideology, or pro-human extinction ideology
1.5> Couldn't find a proper mate
1.6> Celibacy
1.7> etc, etc, etc

2> EVERYONE that has currently 2 children should have 1 more child

3> Half the people that currently have 1 children would hear our call and have 3 children

4> Everyone having 3 or more children would have 1 more child

So, if the program as I proposed would be able to achieve this effect, it would be wonderful, although its highly unlikely. But if it could, I guess it would be worth, even if it would eventually cost 22 billions per year as more people having children would make for more people inside the program rules. No amount of money is too much when survival is at stake.

segunda-feira, 23 de novembro de 2015

White Lives Don't Matter in USA

This just appeared since a few days as top USA News in Google News. Its not something I searched up:


The wife of a Pastor was raped and killed while pregnant. No mention that the 3 murderers were black. You can read it in multiple websites without seeing any mention of this.

Of the major news channels, only Fox News did show the mug shots:


The sister was saying that he was "turning his life around", very funny.

Here is a pro-white news item on the subject:

You have to search it up in pro-white websites like this one to find out:


And a Christian website take on the issue:


The Christian website can't tire of criticizing the "racist non-sense" arising from some people's take on this horror.

Here is a plotting of "murder rate" vs "black population share" in the USA, sorry for the low resolution, but its really hard to find this racist plotting of racist FBI information out there. Clearly the more blacks, the more murders:
Some more statistics (source http://www.infowars.com/black-crime-facts-that-the-white-liberal-media-darent-talk-about/):

– FACT: Despite making up just 13% of the population, blacks commit around half of homicides in the United States. DOJ statistics show that between 1980 and 2008, blacks committed 52% of homicides, compared to 45% of homicides committed by whites.
More up to date FBI statistics tell a similar story. In 2013, black criminals carried out 38% of murders, compared to 31.1% for whites, again despite the fact that there are five times more white people in the U.S.
– FACT: From 2011 to 2013, 38.5 per cent of people arrested for murder, manslaughter, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault were black. This figure is three times higher than the 13% black population figure. When you account for the fact that black males aged 15-34, who account for around 3% of the population, are responsible for the vast majority of these crimes, the figures are even more staggering.
– FACT: Despite the fact that black people commit an equal or greater number of violent crimes than whites, whites are almost TWICE as likely to be killed by police officers.
According to data from the Centers for Disease Control, between 1999 and 2011, 2,151 whites died as a result of being shot by police compared to 1,130 blacks.
– FACT: Despite being outnumbered by whites five to one, blacks commit eight times more crimes against whites than vice-versa, according to FBI statistics from 2007. A black male is 40 times as likely to assault a white person as the reverse. These figures also show that interracial rape is almost exclusively black on white.

Stuff that really matters to USA people:

Meanwhile, also a top USA news, a white teacher said "nigger" and there were protests and she was summarily fired. Oh yeah! Keep it up America, fight hard for what matters, like white people saying "nigger": https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/grade-point/wp/2015/11/23/kansas-professor-under-investigation-for-using-racial-slur-that-left-students-in-tears/

A black teacher saying bad things about whites would never be fired.

Gabrielle Byrd, the classroom’s only black student, told The Washington Post that she almost couldn’t believe what she’d just heard. That particular racial slur, Byrd noted, is one she refuses to speak out loud herself.

“I was incredibly shocked that the word was spoken, regardless of the context,” Byrd said Monday. “I turned to the classmate siting next to me and asked if this was really happening. Before I left the classroom, I was in tears.”

WTF??? "Refuses to speak out loud herself". "in tears" kkkkkkk this is hilarious!! I guess she never heard the music "Nigga, nigga, nigga": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0x5ZRAVXxr8

How a different culture would react to such a thing:

A Yazidi woman that married a Sunni guy and converted was honor-killed by her relatives. To avenge that the Yazidi dared to touch a Sunni woman, the Sunnis massacrated a whole village killing more than 500. For such a small damage (the woman was yazidi afterall), they made a ridiculously huge revange, showing they will fight viciously against anyone that attacks any sunii. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Yazidi_communities_bombings

There is also the case of 2 pakistanis gang-raping a foreigner in Saudi Arabia. The criminals were rightfully beheaded: http://tribune.com.pk/story/66225/two-pakistanis-beheaded-in-saudi-for-rape/

"The two were found guilty of storming the house of a foreign family
and raping a woman" -> soon Saudi Arabia will be safer for whites than
USA? Wierd world...

USA reaction to Blackburn rape & murder:

Nothing, zero, not a single "white lives matter" protest, zip, NO-ONE GIVES A SHIT. Not even the husband.

If it was me, I'm not afraid to say that I'd kill not only the murders, but their sisters, mothers, their whole families.

My conclusions:

Today's whites and also Christian whites, are a bunch of spineless cowards, who couldn't defend themselves from people torturing and murdering them, but even more piece of shit is that they WILL FIGHT agains "racizzttzzz", which pretty much are the only people that GIVE A SHIT. So not only their don't care about being tortured, they fight against those that want to save them.

No, that's not holy, thats not Christian. It is being a spineless piece of shit.

I much prefer Christianity that was not spineless, Christianity that waged crusades, Christianity that killed ottoman soldiers by impaling them anally in spikes, Christianity that conquered the Americas.

This masoquistic, anti-white Christianity? I don't want to have anything to do with it. I'd rather convert to Islam than to have anything with these cowards.